|


| | 
How a Polygraph Works
You hear about lie detectors all the time in police
investigations, and sometimes a person applying for a job will have to undergo a
polygraph test (for example, certain government jobs with the FBI or CIA require
polygraph tests). The goal of a lie detector is to see if the person is telling
the truth or lying when answering certain questions.
When a person takes a polygraph test, four to six sensors are attached
to the person. A polygraph is a machine in which the multiple ("poly") signals
from the sensors are recorded on a single strip of moving paper ("graph"). The
sensors usually record:
 |
The person's breathing rate
|
 |
The person's pulse
|
 |
The person's blood pressure
|
 |
The person's perspiration
|
Sometimes a polygraph will also record things like arm and leg movement.
When the polygraph test starts, the questioner asks three or four simple
questions to establish the norms for the person's signals. Then the real
questions being tested by the polygraph are asked. Throughout questioning, all
of the person's signals are recorded on the moving paper.
Both during and after the test, a polygraph examiner can look at the graphs
and can see whether the vital signs changed significantly on any of the
questions. In general, a significant change (such as a faster heart rate, higher
blood pressure, increased perspiration) indicates that the person is lying.
When a well-trained examiner uses a polygraph, he or she can detect lying
with high accuracy.

An analog polygraph instrument
Most analog polygraphs are being replaced by digital devices.
People tell lies and deceive others for many reasons. Most often, lying is a
defense mechanism used to avoid trouble with the law, bosses or authority
figures. Sometimes, you can tell when someone's lying, but other times it may
not be so easy. Polygraphs, commonly called "lie detectors," are
instruments that monitor a person's physiological reactions. These instruments
do not, as their nickname suggests, detect lies. They can only detect whether
deceptive behavior is being displayed.
Man vs. Machine
A polygraph instrument is basically a combination of medical devices that are
used to monitor changes occurring in the body. As a person is questioned about a
certain event or incident, the examiner looks to see how the person's heart rate,
blood pressure, respiratory rate and electro-dermal activity
(sweatiness, in this case of the fingers) change in comparison to normal levels.
Fluctuations may indicate that person is being deceptive, but exam results are
open to interpretation by the examiner.
|

Physiological responses recorded by a polygraph
|
Polygraph exams are most often associated with criminal investigations, but
there are other instances in which they are used. You may one day be subject to
a polygraph exam before being hired for a job: Many government entities, and
some private-sector employers, will require or ask you to undergo a polygraph
exam prior to employment.
Polygraph examinations are designed to look for
significant involuntary responses going on in a person's body when that person
is subjected to stress, such as the stress associated with deception. The exams
are not able to specifically detect if a person is lying. But there are
certain physiological responses that most of us undergo when attempting to
deceive another person. By asking questions about a particular issue under
investigation and examining a subject's physiological reactions to those
questions, a polygraph examiner can determine if deceptive behavior is being
demonstrated.
|

Today, most polygraph exams are administered with digital
equipment like this.
|
Polygraph Instrument
The polygraph instrument has undergone a dramatic change in the last decade. For
many years, polygraphs were those instruments that you see in the movies with
little needles scribbling lines on a single strip of scrolling paper. These are
called analog polygraphs. Today, most polygraph tests are administered
with digital equipment. The scrolling paper has been replaced with
sophisticated algorithms and computer monitors.
|

Parts of a polygraph that monitor physiological responses
|
When you sit
down in the chair for a polygraph exam, several tubes and wires are connected to
your body in specific locations to monitor your physiological activities.
Deceptive behavior triggers certain physiological changes that can be detected
by a polygraph and a trained examiner
This examiner is looking for the amount of fluctuation in certain physiological
activities. Here's a list of physiological activities that are monitored by the
polygraph and how they are monitored:
 |
Respiratory rate - Two pneumographs,
rubber tubes filled with air, are placed around the test subject's chest and
abdomen. When the chest or abdominal muscles expand, the air inside the tubes
is displaced. In an analog polygraph, the displaced air acts on a bellows,
an accordion-like device that contracts when the tubes expand. This bellows is
attached to a mechanical arm, which is connected to an ink-filled pen that
makes marks on the scrolling paper when the subject takes a breath. A digital
polygraph also uses the pneumographs, but employs transducers to
convert the energy of the displaced air into electronic signals.
|
 |
Blood pressure/heart rate - A
blood-pressure cuff is placed around the subject's upper arm. Tubing runs
from the cuff to the polygraph. As blood pumps through the arm it makes sound;
the changes in pressure caused by the sound displace the air in the tubes,
which are connected to a bellows, which moves the pen. Again, in digital
polygraphs, these signals are converted into electrical signals by
transducers.
|
 |
Galvanic skin resistance (GSR) - This is
also called electro-dermal activity, and is basically a measure of the
sweat on your fingertips. The finger tips are one of the most porous areas on
the body and so are a good place to look for sweat. We sweat more when we are
placed under stress. Fingerplates, called galvanometers, are attached
to two of the subject's fingers. These plates measure the skin's ability to
conduct electricity. When the skin is hydrated (as with sweat), it conducts
electricity much more easily than when it is dry. |
Some polygraphs also record arm, leg and other
physical movements. As the examiner asks questions, signals from the sensors
connected to your body are recorded on a single strip of moving paper.
Voodoo or Valid
Detractors of the polygraph call lie detection a voodoo science, saying that
polygraphs are no more accurate at detecting lies than the flip of a coin.
"Despite claims of 'lie detector' examiners, there is no machine that can detect
lies," reads a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "The
'lie detector' does not measure truth-telling; it measures changes in blood
pressure, breath rate and perspiration rate .., ."
Of course, polygraphs do not detect lies. Over the
years the media has dubbed this lie detection, but from a scientific
perspective, absolutely not. There's no such thing as lie detection. Polygraphs
can detect deceptive behavior even through the stress brought on by the exam
itself. The instrument is attuned to the physiology of the examinee before the
actual tests start, through using what is called an acquaintance test.
Polygraph Examiners
There are only two people in the room during a polygraph exam -- the person
conducting the exam and the subject being tested. Other people in the room
during a test could greatly influence the results of the exam.
My role as a polygraph examiner is that of a seeker of
truth. I'm looking for the truth. I am totally unbiased and neutral when a
person walks in. As soon as I make an assessment that there's no deception
indicated, I immediately become that person's advocate.
The polygraph
examiner has several tasks in
performing a polygraph exam:
 |
Setting up the polygraph and preparing the subject
being tested |
 |
Asking questions
|
 |
Profiling the test subject
|
 |
Analyzing and evaluating test data
|
How the question is presented can greatly affect the
results of a polygraph exam. There are several variables that a polygraph
examiner has to take
into consideration, such as cultural and religious beliefs. Some topics may, by
their mere mention, cause a specific reaction in the test subject that could be
misconstrued as deceptive behavior. The design of the question affects the way
the person processes the information and how he or she responds.
Who's a Qualified Examiner?
There are approximately 3,500 polygraph examiners in the United States, 2,000 of
which belong to a professional organization such as the
American Polygraph Association.
We should all be concerned about the credentials and
qualifications of many polygraph examiners in the United States who do not
belong to some sort of professional organization. Laws regarding polygraph
licensing vary from state to state, and there is no government or private entity
that controls polygraph licensing. Florida, for instance, does not license
polygraph examiners
Today, most polygraph examiners take classes and work
an internship in order to become an accredited examiner with national
associations. Some states also require examiners to be trained. There are many
schools around the United States that have been set up to train people to
conduct polygraph exams. One of these schools is the
International Academy of Polygraph,
which was attended by Dr McGinnis. The school is accredited by the American
Polygraph Association.
Here are the steps that students at the International
Academy of Polygraph must complete before becoming polygraph examiners:
 |
Prior to enrolling in the school, students must
either be: 1. a sworn member, either active or former, of a federal, state
or local law enforcement agency; or have: 2. completed 60 semester hours of
college. |
 |
Students must attend and pass a 10-week intensive
course. The curriculum includes psychology, physiology, ethics, history, question
construction, psychological analysis of speech, chart analysis and test-data
analysis. |
 |
Students must enter an internship program and
conduct a minimum of 30 exams for actual cases. These exams are faculty
reviewed. This internship can take anywhere from six months to one year.
|
Following the completion of these requirements, the
student becomes a polygrapher and may obtain a license in his or her state if
that state requires one.
Going on the Box
Undergoing a lie detector test can be an intimidating experience that can
challenge the nerves of even the most stoic person. You are sitting there with
wires and tubes attached to, and wrapped around, your body. Even if you have
nothing to hide, you could be afraid that the metal-box instrument sitting next
to you will say otherwise. Fittingly, undergoing the uncomfortable experience of
a polygraph test is often referred to as "going on the box."
A polygraph exam is a long process that
is divided
into several stages. Here's how a typical exam might work:
 |
Pretest - This consists of an interview
between the examiner and examinee, where the two individuals get to learn
about each other. This may last about one hour. At this point, the examiner
gets the examinee's side of the story concerning the events under
investigation. While the subject is sitting there answering questions, the
examiner also profiles the examinee. The examiner wants to see how the subject
responds to questions and processes information.
|
 |
Design questions - The examiner designs
questions that are specific to the issue under investigation and reviews these
questions with the subject. All questions must have a single yes or no answer.
|
 |
Test - The actual exam is given. The
first test given is the acquaintance test as previously discussed, also
the examinee is instructed to lie one time on this test. This is so the
examiner can get an idea of the reaction that the examinee demonstrates when
being deceptive and how they react when being truthful. On the actual exam, the examiner asks 10 or 11 questions,
only three or four of which are relevant to the issue or crime being
investigated. The other questions are required to have a valid exam.
|
 |
Post-test - The examiner analyzes the data
of physiological responses and makes a determination regarding whether the
person has been deceptive. If there are significant fluctuations that show up
in the results, this may signal that the subject has been deceptive,
especially if the person displayed similar responses to a question that was
asked repeatedly. Generally, a post-test interview takes place at the end of
the exam. |
Countermeasures
Often, people who are being given a polygraph exam will try to employ
countermeasures in an attempt to beat the instrument. The idea of
countermeasures is to cause (or curtail) a certain reaction that will skew the
test's result. Sometimes attempts at countermeasures have the opposite effect
and result in an invalid test (indicating countermeasures were employed - or the
opposite of the desired result, a failed test. The examiner is trained to look for signs of such attempts and
may employ certain sensors designed for this.
The Legalities of Polygraphs
Polygraphs are rarely admissible in court. New Mexico is the only state in the
United States that allows for open admissibility of polygraph exam results.
Every other state requires some type of stipulation to be met prior to admitting
polygraph exams into record. In most cases, both sides of a legal case have to
agree prior to the trial that they will allow polygraphs to be admitted. On the
federal level, the admissibility criteria are much more vague and admission
typically depends on the approval of the judge.
The main
argument over the admissibility of polygraph tests is based on their accuracy,
or inaccuracy, depending on how you want to view it. The level of accuracy of a
lie detector depends on who you talk to about it, Both sides of the argument
have the same research to look at, but they come to very different conclusions.
Generally, research indicates that polygraph testing is around 90 percent
accurate.
Polygraphs
generally are always admissible when part of a psychological assessment where
other tests are administered.
Federal Cases
At the federal level, there have been specific legal cases that have shaped the
admissibility of polygraphs. The results of these cases are mixed: There have
been some federal circuits that have admitted polygraph results, while others
have flatly denied them. Here are just a few of the legal cases that have shaped
how polygraphs are viewed by the U.S. courts:
 |
Frye v. United States (1923) - U.S. Court of
Appeals of District of Columbia - This is the original decision dealing with
scientific evidence and its admissibility in court. Frye was accused of
murdering a doctor. At the time, he took a unigraph, a precursor to the
polygraph. The unigraph measured only the cardiovascular activities of the
body. The examiner reported Frye to be truthful, and Frye moved to have that
evidence admitted in court. The court ruled that before any scientific
evidence could be admitted into the court of law it must first be accepted by
the scientific community. At that time, there were no studies done on
unigraphs or polygraphs, so the evidence was not admitted.
|
 |
United States v. Piccinonna (1989) - U.S.
Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit - This decision allowed for polygraph results
to be admitted in court, but only if one of two requirements is met: Either
the two parties in the case agree to allow it, or the judge decides to allow
it based on criteria established by the 11th Circuit.
|
 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
(1993) - U.S. Supreme Court - The court opened the door for scientific
evidence, and gave judges broader discretion as to whether or not to admit
polygraphs. This applies to all federal courts but does not apply in state
courts, although particular states do accept this ruling.
|
 |
United States v. Scheffer (1998) - U.S.
Supreme Court - Moving beyond the broader topic of scientific evidence, this
military case directly involved polygraphs. The court ruled that the U.S.
president has the prerogative to deny polygraph results in military tribunals
because polygraph testing is so controversial. |
It seems clear that no final decision has been made on
the federal level. At the state level, polygraph admissibility is generally
handled on a case-by-case basis. The courts' ambiguity stems from the
questionable validity of polygraph exams. Interestingly, the biggest opponent to
polygraph admission in court is the U.S. federal government, which happens to be
the largest consumer of polygraphs exams.
|
Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988
Employees in the private sector are not subjected to polygraph exams
like employees of the federal government. The U.S. federal government is
the largest consumer of polygraph exams. Private sector employees are
protected by the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA). This
law only affects commercial businesses. It does not apply to schools,
prisons, other public agencies or some businesses under contract with the
federal government.
EPPA provides that a business cannot require a pre-employment polygraph
and cannot subject current employees to polygraph exams. A business is
allowed to request an exam, but cannot force anyone to undergo a test. If
an employee refuses a suggested exam, the business is not allowed
discipline or discharge that employee based on his or her refusal.
|
Who Uses Polygraphs?
Polygraphs are frequently used by the U.S. government. Here are some
entities and occasions that may call for the use of a polygraph:
 |
National security (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central
Intelligence Agency, Homeland Security, National Security Agency,
etc.) |
 |
Criminal investigation |
 |
Pre-employment screening |
 |
Internal-affairs investigations of law enforcement
|
 |
Banks |
 |
Psychosexual Assessment |
 |
Domestic issues (such as:
fidelity, child custody) |
Related Links:
|